Modelling and Performance Analyses of Annular Equivalent Circulation Density in Extended Reach Wells Using Response Surface Methodology

Authors

  • Isaac Eze Ihua-Maduenyi Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rivers State University, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Eniye Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70112/ajeat-2025.14.2.4298

Keywords:

Annular Equivalent Circulating Density (AECD), Extended Reach Wells (ERWs), Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Sensitivity Analysis, Drilling Hydraulics

Abstract

This study presents a rigorous investigation into the modeling and optimization of annular equivalent circulating density (AECD) in extended reach wells (ERWs) using a hybrid approach that integrates physics-based simulation from Landmark Well Plan with statistical modeling via response surface methodology (RSM). This approach quantitatively assesses the influence of critical operational parameters-including pump rate (200–300 gal/min), rate of penetration (ROP: 25–45 ft/h), rotary speed (20–40 rpm), and cuttings density (2.1–2.16 sg)-on AECD variation and interactions in a 35,017 ft measured depth of an 8½-in wellbore drilled with water-based mud. Sensitivity analysis conducted in Well Plan showed that increasing the pump rate from 200 to 300 gal/min resulted in a reduction of AECD from 18.91 to 14.94 ppg, a 21% decrease attributed to the increase in annular velocity and the corresponding improvement in cuttings transport. Meanwhile, raising the ROP from 25 to 50 ft/h led to an increase in AECD of 0.87 ppg, due to elevated cuttings concentration and frictional pressure loss. Increasing rotary speed from 60 to 200 rpm reduced AECD by 0.79 ppg, demonstrating enhanced cuttings agitation and reduced solids bed accumulation. Conversely, cuttings density exhibited a strong positive effect on AECD, with values rising from 16.97 to 17.64 ppg across the density range of 2.1 to 2.16 sg. A second-order quadratic RSM model was developed to capture the nonlinear and interaction effects of these parameters on AECD, achieving an R² of 0.9630, an adjusted R² of 0.9259, and a predicted R² of 0.7866. The model also demonstrated a low coefficient of variation (CV = 1.7%) and a standard deviation of 0.0142 ppg, confirming its excellent predictive capability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) validated the statistical significance of the model, with a model F-value of 38.41 and p-values < 0.0001 for all linear, interaction, and quadratic terms. Contour plots illustrated strong synergistic interactions, particularly between ROP and cuttings density, where combined increases caused AECD to approach formation fracture thresholds unless mitigated by higher pump rates and rotary speeds. The study demonstrates that the integrated Well Plan–RSM framework offers a high-resolution predictive tool for AECD management in ERWs, facilitating real-time hydraulic optimization and operational decision-making. This, in turn, improves wellbore integrity and reduces non-productive time by up to 12%, representing a significant advancement in drilling hydraulics design, particularly for complex extended reach trajectories.

References

[1] A. Alsaihati, S. Elkatatny, and A. Abdulraheem, “Real-time prediction of equivalent circulation density for horizontal wells using intelligent machines,” ACS Omega, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 934–942, 2020.

[2] M. Al-Rubaii, M. Al-Shargabi, B. Aldahlawi, D. Al-Shehri, and K. M. Minaev, “A developed robust model and artificial intelligence techniques to predict drilling fluid density and equivalent circulation density in real time,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 14, p. 6594, 2023.

[3] K. Alasgarov, Analysis of Equivalent Circulation Density Management in Drilling Operations, M.S. thesis, Khazar Univ., Azerbaijan, 2017.

[4] K. Z. Abdelgawad, M. Elzenary, S. Elkatatny, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem, and S. Patil, “New approach to evaluate the equivalent circulating density (ECD) using artificial intelligence techniques,” J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1569–1578, 2019.

[5] M. A. Alum and F. Egbon, “Semi-analytical models on the effect of drilling fluid properties on rate of penetration (ROP),” in SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, pp. SPE-150806, 2011.

[6] H. H. Alkinani, A. T. Al-Hameedi, S. Dunn-Norman, M. A. Al-Alwani, R. A. Mutar, and W. H. Al-Bazzaz, “Data-driven neural network model to predict equivalent circulation density ECD,” in SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, pp. D021S010R001, 2019.

[7] F. Badrouchi, V. Rasouli, and N. Badrouchi, “Impact of hole cleaning and drilling performance on the equivalent circulating density,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 211, p. 110150, 2022.

[8] N. Bolivar, J. Young, S. Dear, J. Massam, and T. Reid, “Field result of equivalent-circulating-density reduction with a low-rheology fluid,” in SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, pp. SPE-105487, 2007.

[9] K. Bybee, “Equivalent-circulating-density fluctuation in extended-reach drilling,” J. Pet. Technol., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 64–67, 2009.

[10] V. Dokhani, Y. Ma, and M. Yu, “Determination of equivalent circulating density of drilling fluids in deepwater drilling,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 1096–1105, 2016.

[11] X. L. Guo, Z. M. Wang, and Z. H. Long, “Study on three-layer unsteady model of cuttings transport for extended-reach well,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 73, no. 1–2, pp. 171–180, 2010.

[12] W. Huang and D. Gao, “Analysis of drilling difficulty of extended-reach wells based on drilling limit theory,” Petrol. Sci., vol. 19, pp. 1099–1109, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.12.030.

[13] K. C. Igwilo, E. E. Okoro, P. N. Ohia, P. Nwanro, and N. C. Izuwa, “A new approach to wellbore stability models using diagnostic iterative design: Case study-Niger Delta,” Petrol. Coal, vol. 62, no. 2, 2020.

[14] K. C. Igwilo, E. E. Okoro, A. A. Nwude, A. O. Mamudu, and C. Y. Onuh, “A review on gas well optimization using production performance models-A case study of horizontal well,” Open J. Yangtze Oil Gas, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2018.

[15] K. C. Igwilo, Y. Yikarebogha, J. U. Obibuike, and N. Uwaezuoke, “Investigation of hydraulics performance of periwinkle shell powder for HPHT cementing operations in the Niger Delta,” Petrol. Coal, vol. 66, no. 3, 2024.

[16] X. Li, D. Gao, Y. Zhou, and H. Zhang, “Study on open-hole extended-reach limit model analysis for horizontal drilling in shales,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 520–533, 2016.

[17] X. Li, D. Gao, and X. Chen, “A comprehensive prediction model of hydraulic extended-reach limit considering the allowable range of drilling fluid flow rate in horizontal drilling,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3083, 2017.

[18] H. Miao, Z. Qiu, V. Dokhani, Y. Ma, and D. Zhang, “Numerical modeling of transient cuttings transport in deviated wellbores,” Geoenergy Sci. Eng., vol. 227, p. 211875, 2023.

[19] S. Naganawa and K. Okatsu, “Fluctuation of equivalent circulating density in extended reach drilling with repeated formation and erosion of cuttings bed,” in IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, pp. SPE-115149, 2008.

[20] M. S. Nobandegani, M. R. S. Birjandi, T. Darbandi, M. M. Khalilipour, F. Shahraki, and D. Mohebbi-Kalhori, “An industrial steam methane reformer optimization using response surface methodology,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 540–549, 2016.

[21] K. O. Omomo, A. E. Esiri, and H. C. Olisakwe, “Hydraulic modeling and real-time optimization of drilling fluids: A future perspective,” 2024, doi: 10.58175/gjret.2024.2.2.0030.

[22] S. W. Petrie and R. Doll, “Benefits of using continuous circulation systems in ERD wells to manage ECD, bottom hole pressure and hole cleaning,” in SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, pp. D031S015R002, SPE-2021.

[23] T. Robinson, D. Gomes, M. H. MeorHashim, M. H. Yusoff, M. F. Arriffin, A. Mohamad, and E. Othman, “Real-time estimation of downhole equivalent circulating density ECD using machine learning and applications,” in SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, pp. D022S008R001, SPE-2022.

[24] N. Uwaezuoke, K. C. Igwilo, E. E. Okoro, S. Adenubi, and J. U. Obibuike, “Improved model for equivalent circulating density and improved annular pressure drop estimation: Drilling approach,” Petrol. Coal, vol. 64, no. 1, 2022.

[25] J. Xiang, J. Wang, W. Lou, X. Wang, C. Zhao, and F. Zhang, “Quantitative analysis and modeling of transient cuttings transport impact on drill string mechanics in extended reach drilling,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 35, 2024.

[26] D. D. Yusuf, E. J. Upahi, and H. O. Yusuf, “Multi-response optimization of planting process of a seed ridge planter using response surface methodology (RSM),” Arid Zone J. Eng. Technol. Environ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 897–910, 2023.

[27] M. Yusuf, A. S. Farooqi, M. A. Alam, L. K. Keong, K. Hellgardt, and B. Abdullah, “Response surface optimization of syngas production from greenhouse gases via DRM over high-performance Ni–W catalyst,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 72, pp. 31058–31071, 2022.

Downloads

Published

20-10-2025

How to Cite

Ihua-Maduenyi, I. E., & Oguta, E. (2025). Modelling and Performance Analyses of Annular Equivalent Circulation Density in Extended Reach Wells Using Response Surface Methodology. Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology, 14(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajeat-2025.14.2.4298